Research on Green product R&D Strategies under Different Sales Modes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65514/pqmb8c56Keywords:
Green product innovation; independent R&D; Cooperative R&D; Sales ModesAbstract
Manufacturers faced the dilemma of independently developing green products or collaborating with e-commerce platforms for joint development. To address this, a two-level green supply chain consisting of a single manufacturer and a single e-commerce platform was examined using game theory methods to explore the strategy selection for green product development under different sales models (distribution and consignment). The study found that under the distribution model, as the technology spillover effect of the e-commerce platform strengthens, the product wholesale price, retail price, manufacturer’s R&D effort, e-commerce platform’s R&D investment, market demand, and profits of both parties all increased monotonically. Collaborative R&D invariably represented the Pareto-optimal solution for both the manufacturer and the e-commerce platform. However, under the consignment model, although the product retail price, manufacturer’s R&D effort, e-commerce platform’s R&D investment, and market demand continued to grow in tandem with the strengthening of the technology spillover effect, the manufacturer’s profit exhibited a non-monotonic trend of “first decreasing and then increasing”. At the same time, the platform’s profit initially increased, followed by a decrease, and then another increase. In this model, collaborative R&D was the optimal strategy for both parties only when the e-commerce platform’s R&D cost coefficient was relatively high.
References
1.Cai, J., Sun, H., Shang, J., Qazi, Z., & Chen, H. (2023). Information structure selection in a green supply chain: Impacts of wholesale price and greenness level. European Journal of Operational Research, 306(1), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.002
2.Chen, X., Wang, X., & Zhou, M. (2019). Firms’ green R&D cooperation behaviour in a supply chain: Technological spillover, power and coordination. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.033
3.Dou, G., & Choi, T. M. (2024). Compete or cooperate? Effects of channel relationships on government policies for sustainability. European Journal of Operational Research, 313(2), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.08.012
4.Feng, Y., Lai, K., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Green supply chain innovation: Emergence, adoption, and challenges. International Journal of Production Economics,248,108497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108497
5.Hosseini-Motlagh, S.-M., Ebrahimi, S., & Jokar, A. (2021). Sustainable supply chain coordination under competition and green effort scheme. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(2), 304–319.https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1671152
6.Jin, M., Zhang, X., Xiong, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Implications of green optimism upon sustainable supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 295(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.02.036
7.Li, J., Wang, H., Shi, V., & Li, G. (2024). Manufacturer's choice of online selling format in a dual-channel supply chain with green products. European Journal of Operational Research, 318(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.04.038
8.Ma, X., Talluri, S., Ferguson, M., & Tiwari, S. (2022). Strategic production and responsible sourcing decisions under an emissions trading scheme. European Journal of Operational Research, 303(3), 1429–1443.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.04.003
9.Pal, B., Sarkar, A., & Sarkar, B. (2023). Optimal decisions in a dual-channel competitive green supply chain management under promotional effort. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 118315.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118315
10.Raza, S. A., & Govindaluri, S. M. (2019). Greening and price differentiation coordination in a supply chain with partial demand information and cannibalization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 706–726.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.371
11.Tao, F., Zhou, Y., Bian, J., & Lai, K. K. (2024). Agency selling or reselling? Channel selection of green products with consumer environmental awareness. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(2), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2022.2114436
12.Tao, F., Zhou, Y., Bian, J., & Lai, K. K. (2023). Optimal channel structure for a green supply chain with consumer green-awareness demand. Annals of Operations Research, 324(1), 601–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04665-9
13.Wan, M., Xu, J., Li, C., & Qin, G. (2024). Dynamic path for green product development: A game-theoretic analysis of product-process innovation with supply chain collaboration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 195, 110428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110428
14.Wang, J., Yan, Y., Du, H., & Li, C. (2020). The optimal sales format for green products considering downstream investment. International Journal of Production Research, 58(4), 1107–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1612963
15.Wu, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, J. (2021). Cooperation of green R&D in supply chain with downstream competition. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 160, 107571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107571
16.Yan, Y., Zhao, R., & Chen, H. (2018). Prisoner’s dilemma on competing retailers’ investment in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.229
17.Yang, D., Xiao, T., & Huang, J. (2019). Dual-channel structure choice of an environmental responsibility supply chain with green investment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.014
18.Yang, F., Kong, J., Liu, T., & Shui, W. (2022). Cooperation and coordination in green supply chain with R&D uncertainty. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1848359
19.Yang, M. (2023). Green investment and e-commerce sales mode selection strategies with cap-and-trade regulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 177, 109036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109036
20.Yu, X., Lan, Y., & Zhao, R. (2021). Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: Vertical collaboration or co-development? Omega, 98, 102116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102116
21.Zhang, X., Huang, J., & Shen, C. (2023). Retailers’ incentives for green investment in differentiated competition channels. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 8(4), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2023.03.002
22.Zhang, X., Jin, Y., & Shen, C. (2020). Manufacturers’ green investment in a competitive market with a common retailer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123164
23.Zhu, J., Gao, Y., Shi, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Green investment mechanism considering supply chain risk aversion and negotiating power. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 134944.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108484
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Contemporary Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
